Sutnick & Sutnick Attorneys at Law
X
X

Default Template

The rules of evidence were created to limit the introduction of prejudicial evidence, and to ensure that the evidence that was allowed had some substantive impact on the matter at hand. Despite this very noble goal, evidence that lacks scientific validity, substantive currency and, worse of all, evidence that biases the jury is introduced on a regular basis. This is especially true in cases involving sex crime charges.

According to a recent report, a 33-year-old New Jersey man from Matawan was indicted last week for allegedly committing multiple sex offenses. The prosecution has accused him of attacking a 49-year-old Matawan woman and a 31-year-old Aberdeen woman. The Matawan man's arrest followed a four-month joint investigation by the Aberdeen police, Matawan police and the Monmouth County Prosecutors Office.

A New Jersey grand jury indicted the man on aggravated sexual assault charges, attempted aggravated sexual assault, burglary and criminal restraint charges. If he is convicted on the aggravated sexual assault charge, he could face up to 20 years in prison, followed by supervised release and a lifetime of registering as a convicted sex offender. The man is currently being held at Monmouth County Correctional Institution.

While many forms of evidence can be used in court, prosecutors often rely on eyewitness testimony to convict alleged sex offenders. According to numerous studies, however, eyewitness testimony is incredibly unreliable. This is particularly true in cases where the witness was under stress. Understanding this fact, and knowing how to limit the impact such evidence on a jury. is the role of any good defense attorney.

Source: NJ.com, "Matawan man indicted on sexual assault, burglar charges," Ashley Peskoe, May 23, 2013.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

What Our Clients Are Saying

  • "Sutnick & Sutnick are two truly outstanding lawyers. They have helped me with several difficult issues over the years, and have never failed me once.

    I wholeheartedly recommend them to whoever reads this, as I do to all my friends and family whenever they need help. They are kind, professional, and know what they’re doing." T.K.

Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

View More

Do You Have Questions? We Have Answers.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

  • new jersey supreme court
  • HLA

No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Court Plaza South, West Wing
21 Main St #171
Hackensack, NJ 07601

Phone: 201-212-4532
Fax: 201-342-7557
HACKENSACK OFFICE

172 East 161 Street
Bronx, NY 10451

Phone: 201-212-4532
Phone: 212-414-4330
Fax: 201-342-7557
BRONX OFFICE

500 Valley Road
Wayne, NJ 07470

Phone: 201-212-4532
Fax: 201-342-7557
WAYNE OFFICE